2014年1月1日星期三

修宪是推动现代民主制度的首要任务——翁山蘇姬推動修憲 宣布競選總統

宪法是民主制度的基础,而民主制度才是人权的保障。因此,我们呼吁各位加入我们的公民修宪运动。以下内容摘自台湾大纪元网站,涉及缅甸民运领袖昂山素季推动修宪的消息:

【記者黃捷瑄/綜合編譯】緬甸的民主運動領袖翁山蘇姬12月28日宣布,她將參與2015年的總統大選,即使目前的緬甸憲法阻止了她參選。同時,翁山蘇姬也與她所屬的全國民主聯盟(NLD)爭取民眾支持修憲。
據美聯社報導,全民盟發言人那溫在記者會上說:「全民盟將參與2015年的選舉。」緬甸的總統是由國會選出,而不是民眾直選。全民盟希望在2015年的選舉中能有好成績,以便推派他們自己的總統候選人,而翁山蘇姬也表達了角逐的意願。總統選舉通常在國會選舉後的第一個會期舉行。
這是翁山蘇姬所屬的全民盟首度宣布參與選舉。2008年的憲法是由緬甸的前軍政府起草,裡面一些特殊條款保障了軍隊在政府中的影響力。而全民盟認為,憲法強制分配25%的席位給軍隊,還把翁山蘇姬排除在總統選舉之外都是不民主的。
對此不健全的憲法,全民盟2010年宣布抵制選舉。到了2012年補選時,由於選舉法修改,全民盟參與了選舉。當時全民盟在兩院共45席的缺額中贏得了43席,而翁山蘇姬本人也成為眾議員。
翁山蘇姬表示,如果憲法不在2015年選舉前修改,「會有很多問題出現」。今年10月,翁山蘇姬及全民盟在全國許多地方發起了宣傳活動,爭取公眾支持修憲。

2013年12月22日星期日

10-10 Declaration - Call for Constitutional Amendment Campaign of Chinese Citizens

(Dear English readers and friends,
We invite you to read the draft translation for us and give us suggestions for improvement.  Our contact info is: xiuxianxiaozu@gmail.com  Thank you.)


Dear fellow Chinese citizens,

The authors are the launching group of the constitutional amendment campaign of Chinese citizens.  We the launching group hold that the current Constitution of the People’s Republic of China (“the Constitution”), as the supreme law of the country, has disregarded and defied human rights and liberty of Chinese citizens, resulting in serious rights violations on individuals and groups.  The following cases demonstrate serious problems regarding human rights under the Constitution:

1.       Xia Junfeng’s case Vs. Bo Gu Kailai’s case: Although both cases involved homicide, Xia obviously had no malice or pre-intention to kill.  He, a street vender, killed the urban management officers with his knife (a working tool) when trying to defend himself as the latter severely beat him, but consequently was sentenced to death penalty with immediate effect; while the urban management officers who severely beat Xia Junfeng was officially recognized as martyr and rewarded 900 thousand RMB national compensation!  Bo Gu Kailai deliberately killed a British citizen Hywood under no external attack or manslaughter, but escaped the death penalty with immediate effect.  Comparing both cases, we learn that everyone is not equal before law.  The fact is that officials enjoy higher legal status than citizens.
2.       Free people are not free (e.g., Chen Guangcheng, Liu Xia, and Hu Jia have been long confined in their homes under illegal harassment and violence from the police).  The government denies citizens’ freedom at their own discretion under the excuse of executing laws, and thus denied that freedom be inborn and inalienable human rights. That the government can violate human rights at will demonstrate that government enjoys higher legal status than citizens.
3.       Freedom of religion is not safeguarded and freedom of thoughts & conscience is denied.
Article 18 of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights affirms that everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, but in China, the Falungong practitioners and the entire groups of rights defense lawyers are persecuted. Government causes many rights violation cases on dissidents and residents who protest for environment issues or judicial justices. Other rights disasters linger on in everyone’s mind such as more than 100 Tibetan self-immolation cases as protest for freedom of religion and the June 4th Massacre in 1989 when the PLA field army intruded into Beijing city under the martial law, resulting in casualties of thousands of peaceful protesters including Beijing residents as well as students…. All these cases involve serious rights violations, because the Constitution does not recognize the freedom of thoughts, conscience and religion.  Instead, the Constitution affirms the teachings of Marxism, Mao Zedong thoughts and patriotism (See preamble of the Constitution).  By this means, the Constitution harshly restricts the freedom of religion under the rule that “Religious bodies and religious affairs are not subject to any foreign domination.”  The freedom of demonstrations, protests, strikes and assemblies are thus restricted under similar excuse.

These cases may not directly concern you but some articles surely directly affect you, e.g. residential registration mechanism.  You lose your freedom of movement and residence under this mechanism (the freedom of movement and residence is one of the fundamental rights in The Universal Declaration of Human Rights).  Where you were born becomes your “home” land.  According to law, your freedom of moving and residing in other places is legally restricted or curbed.  Because of the residential registration system, Chinese citizens are not equal in respects of human rights and dignity.  A citizen born in Beijing, though Chinese citizen like all others enjoys privileges in terms of education, cultural lives, urban facilities, medical care and pensions!  Even among Beijing citizens, people born in different districts of Beijing city are treated unfairly in regards of education and development opportunities.
We the launching group hold that the reason why violation of human rights is so extensive in China is that the Constitution _ the supreme law stipulates many articles in defiance of human rights. Under this “Emperor-styled” Law (the traditional written or oral commandments that were especially made to monger and oppress people in the centrally controlled authoritarianism regime, plus the “fundamental principles from the god”), Chinese citizens are deprived of their rights and liberty defined by the international laws.
China, the first state in the world that signed the Charter of the United Nations and the council state of the United Nations, should undertake the obligations to observe the Charter and other signed and ratified international conventions and protocols (“The International Laws”).  The Preamble of the Charter of the United Nations iterates in the beginning “WE THE PEOPLES OF THE UNITED NATIONS DETERMINED to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind, and to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights…. have agreed to the present Charter of the United Nations and do hereby establish an international organisation to be known as the United Nations.”  Till today, China has signed and approved the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights”, the “International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights” and the “United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment” (“Convention against Torture”), and signed “the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights” (to be ratified).
According to the explanation published on the official website of the UN, the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” together with “the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights” and its two optional protocols and the “International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights” is called “International human rights law”.  Based on this we believe that Chinese government is obliged to ensure by the Constitution that the international human rights law and the “Convention against Torture” be observed and followed.  In order to respect human rights, the human rights law has to be the supreme law of the county, i.e., the Constitution.  Only in this way, we can make sure that human rights are the first and utmost mission and responsibility of the government.
The UN affirms that the principle of universality of human rights is the cornerstone of international human rights law. All human rights are indivisible, whether they are civil and political rights, such as the right to life, equality before the law and freedom of expression; economic, social and cultural rights, such as the rights to work, social security and education, or collective rights, such as the rights to development and self-determination, are indivisible, interrelated and interdependent. The deprivation of one right adversely affects the others.
On careful comparison between the current Constitution and the relevant international laws regarding human rights, we find out that Chinese Constitution severely break the International human rights law and the “Convention against Torture” by tactful means, as described in the following:
1.       Deny the freedom of thought and conscience by keeping silent, and meantime stipulate anti-freedom of thought and conscience rules in the name of building spiritual civilization.
Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights affirms that “everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion.”
However, the Constitution keeps silent with the freedom of thought and conscience, instead Article 24 of the Constitution states “The state strengthens the building of socialist spiritual civilization through spreading education in high ideals and morality, general education and education in discipline and the legal system, and through promoting the formulation and observance of rules of conduct and common pledges by different sections of the people in urban and rural areas,” meantime it also articulates, “The state advocates the civic virtues of love for the motherland, for the people, for labour, for science and for socialism; it educates the people in patriotism, collectivism, internationalism and communism and in dialectical and historical materialism; it combats the decadent ideas of capitalism and feudalism and other decadent ideas.”  That is to say, the state uses the excuse of “building spiritual civilization” to control people’s thoughts, deprive the people of the right to freedom of independent thoughts and conscience, and preach patriotism, Marxism and Leninism and define these as the “socialist civic virtues” and list all the other thoughts as “capitalism, feudalism and other decadent ideas”.  This article sharply contradicts against Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that “everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience”.

2.       Superficially admit freedom of religion, but meantime restrict or deprive the freedom of religion by using extralegal restrictions
In respect of religion, Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights affirms that everyone has the right to freedom of religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.  Although article 36 of the Constitution claims that citizens of the People's Republic of China enjoy freedom of religious belief, such freedom is restricted by the following pre-set conditions that “no one may make use of religion to engage in activities that disrupt public order, impair the health of citizens or interfere with the educational system of the state. Religious bodies and religious affairs are not subject to any foreign domination.”  Thus Chinese government manages to use article 36 of the Constitution to persecute Falungong practitioners in the name of “wicked religion”; Muslims in Sinkiang in the name of “disrupting public order” as well as Tibetan Buddhists and Christians practicing religion in private churches in the name of “subject to foreign domination”.

3.       Deny human rights by citing other articles in the Constitution.
International human rights law affirms that human rights are rights inherent to all human beings and human rights entail both rights and obligations.  In regards with rights and obligations, UN explains that both individuals and states have to undertake obligations.  At the individual level, while we are entitled our human rights, we should also respect the human rights of others.  For the states, states assume obligations and duties under international law to respect, to protect and to fulfill human rights.   The obligation to respect means that States must refrain from interfering with or curtailing the enjoyment of human rights.
Nevertheless, in chapter 2 of the Constitution, THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF CITIZENS, it is stated that the state respect and protect human rights, but emphasis on the other side that “every citizen enjoys the rights and at the same time must perform the duties prescribed by the constitution and the law”.  This is to say enjoying rights have pre-set conditions; rights are not inherent to all human beings and inalienable.  This pre-set condition is “abide by the law”.  As a result, when laws restrict or deprive human rights, citizens consequently lose their inherent and inalienable rights in order to “abide by the law”.
In addition to that, article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights says everyone “has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.” Article 20 (1) says everyone “has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.”
Although article 35 of the Constitution says citizens of the People's Republic of China “enjoy freedom of speech, of the press, of assembly, of association, of procession and of demonstration”, article 1 of the Constitution stipulates “the socialist system is the basic system of the People’s Republic of China. Sabotage of the socialist system by any organization or individual is prohibited.”  The so-called freedoms of the citizens are deprived in the name of “sabotaging the socialist system”.  The hundreds of citizens became criminals of conscience in names of “incited subversion of the government”, “illegal assembly” and “sabotaging the public order”, just because they requested officials to publically report their assets and called for ending the one-party rule authoritarianism by publically showing their opinions on the sign boards they prepared and held on hand.  These are the examples of depriving human rights stated in some articles of the Constitution by citing other articles of the Constitution.

4.       UN holds that equality is the foundation of human rights, yet Chinese Constitution denies the fundamental principle that all are equal before the law by cunningly changing the wording.
Article 33 writes “All citizens of the People's Republic of China are equal before the law”, but if we analyse article 41 “Citizens of the People's Republic of China have the right to criticize and make suggestions to any state organ or functionary”; “Citizens have the right to make to relevant state organs complaints and charges against, or exposures of, violation of the law or dereliction of duty by any state organ or functionary”; and “Citizens who have suffered losses through infringement of their civil rights by any state organ or functionary have the right to compensation in accordance with the law.”, we may find out that citizens are in obvious inferior status as compared with the state organ or functionary as citizens are not entitled to sue the state organ or functionary to the court of law. Citizens who suffer losses through infringement of their rights by state organ or functionary are only allowed to request for compensation but not to sue them to the court of law.  This reminds us of the urban management staff.  The functionary from this state organ can beat Mr. Ji Zhongxing, a motor cycle taxi driver, to so serious disabilities that he can’t live without personal care on daily life.  Yet he is impossible to win anything if he wanted to sue or even simply complain against the state organ or functionary.  This is the wide-spreading scenario that hundreds of thousands of persecuted petitioners are experiencing in their daily lives!

5.       What makes the conditions worse is that even though the Constitution admit the rights and freedom of citizens, the government can still use the unconstitutional “administrative rules” to openly violate human rights, with all conveniences. For example,
1)       Article 37 of the Constitution writes, “The freedom of person of citizens of the People's Republic of China is inviolable. No citizen may be arrested except with the approval or by decision of a people's procuratorate or by decision of a people's court, and arrests must be made by a public security organ. Unlawful deprivation or restriction of citizens' freedom of person by detention or other means is prohibited; and unlawful search of the person of citizens is prohibited.”  However, the Re-education-through-Labor (RTL) prevailing in the country detains citizens for as long as three years without any trials.  The so-called psychiatric hospital controlled by the public security bureau (e.g. Ankang Hospital) and the black jails in the names of “hotels” or “senior citizen care centers” detain citizens without even involving procuratorate or court of law.

2)       Article 38 of the Constitution writes “The personal dignity of citizens of the People's Republic of China is inviolable. Insult, libel, false charge or frame-up directed against citizens by any means is prohibited.”  But in prinsons, RTL camps and even in schools and other public or private places, how many cases happen that citizens’ dignity is violated only because the violators are backed by power? Are these rare?!  Just a simple example can show this: State Bureau for Letters and Calls conduct hand search on both male and female petitioners at the entrance (including lower part of the body).  Should such insulting act be the administrative regulation of the state organ!

3)             Article 13 of the Constitution writes, “The state protects the right of citizens to own lawfully earned income, savings, houses and other lawful property”; article 39 writes, “The home of citizens of the People's Republic of China is inviolable. Unlawful search of, or intrusion into, a citizen's home is prohibited”.  However, the prevailing governmental demolishing campaign has caused wide-spreading forced evictions of civilian residence.  The citizens are not secured in their own homes; more seriously, casualties are often reported for the forced evictions.  The reason why this happens is that behind this right, the Constitution has another clause which says, “The state may in the public interest take over land for its use in accordance with the law, and compensate the land users.”  This article has shown that rights of the citizens have to go after the state-claimed “public interest”.  What is public interest?  It is not mentioned anywhere in the Constitution or other laws.

Considering the above-mentioned scenario, we call on Chinese citizens to join the constitutional amendment campaign so as to ensure that the new Constitution protect human rights and make us part of UN people in real term, and we enjoy true human rights and freedom.  We appeal for the following in specific:

1.    Ensure that “all are equal before the law”.  The state organ and functionary should be equal to citizens.
2.    Remove the “Four cardinal principles” from the Constitution, because they sharply restrict, prohibit and violate the fundamental human rights, and are the direct causing factor of the denial of citizens’ rights of the freedom to thoughts, conscience, and religion as well as other fundamental rights.
3.    Cover in the Constitution the fundamental rights and freedom that are affirmed by international human rights law and to be ratified by the government.
4.    To restrict the government from arbitrary violations on human rights, an independent legitimate institution has to make laws on the government’s work and proceedings on behalf of all citizens.  An impartial judiciary institution has to be established to oversee the implementation of the relevant laws.
5.    The powers not delegated to the government by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the government, are reserved to the people.
6.    The government or legislative institution shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
7.    The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Given that the current constitution, law and governmental rules virtually do not provide human rights protections and human rights violations happen so frequently in China, all left without fair settlements, we the group call for closed signatories of this declaration among Chinese citizens inside or outside China in order to ensure their life safety and security.  Please email to: xiuxianxiaozu@gmail.com for signatures.  You may choose any subject with “real name + ID No.” as the content in the email.  On receiving your email, we the group will provide you with a random signatory’s ID generated by the computer.  When there are 100,000 signatories, we the group are to disclose the list of signatories listing the names and signatory’s ID in alphabetic order.  When we have 200,000 signatories, we the group are to submit the declaration to the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress; and meantime, we are to submit a copy with the name list of signatories to the UN Committee against torture as well as another one set to the UN Refugee Agency to seek concern and protection from both institutions.

For the sake of your freedom and your rights protection, we the launching group of the Constitutional Amendment Campaign by Chinese Citizens sincerely invite you to join us as signatories.  As we are not to immediately disclose the signatories’ information, your life safety will be ensured to certain degree.  We anticipate your response and thank you for your participation.

Proposed and written by,
The launching group of the Constitutional Amendment Campaign by Chinese Citizens
On Oct 10, 2013


Email for signatories: xiuxianxiaozu@gmail.com

2013年11月4日星期一

“多数人暴政”披上民主的外衣;“人民权力”剥夺了“公民权利”

民主有一个重要原则就是在人人平等的前提下坚持少数服从多数,这也是民主制度的重要基础。然而与民主制度对立的有一个制度叫做“多数人统治”制度[1],这个制度由“多数人”做出政治决策,将他们自己的利益放在远远高于个人和少数群体之上,从而形成活跃的法律压迫,其程度与暴君和专制独裁者一样。在很多情况下,多数派利用现行的多数人统治的程序故意惩罚那些被仇视的少数民族、宗教信仰者或者少数人种的族群。目前有三个方法限制多数人暴政的发生:1、以宪法限制执法机构的权力;2、引进权利法案;3、分权机制

将中国现有政治体制对照上述内容,我们可以看到:中国的体制就是一个以“人民民主专政”为名的多数人暴政体制。这个“人民”就是以“多数人”为由实施专制暴政统治的主体,人民的利益远远高于“个人”和“少数人群体”之上。

与之对应的,民主制度下的少数服从多数是按照基于各人的主观认识和意愿得到充分表达后形成的多数和少数,这些多数与少数是动态的且不是按照人的出生、种族、民族、价值观、信仰等进行人为分类而形成的少数与多数。而且,民主制度之下的人人平等原则确保了任何法律形成之后,对所有人都具备同等的效力,而不是对某特定人群进行偏袒或打压(例如中国宪法明显对公共机构(即政府部门)和公务人员(即机关工作人员)进行偏袒,而且这些部门与人员代表着“人民”享受着超公民待遇的照顾与权力,同时对普通没有职务的公民的权利进行剥夺,这些公民在法律面前一律平等(言下之意就是:布衣草民待遇一律相等)。

各位被剥夺公民权利的朋友们,请加入我们的中国公民修宪运动,让我们积聚起公民的力量,来夺回我们自己的权力和权利。详见:《“双十”宣言——中国公民修宪运动倡议书》 我们进行非公开联署,邮箱是:xiuxianxiaozu@gmail.com